Showkatbakhsh R, Jamilian A, Eslamian L. Treatment effects of R-appliance and Bionator in Class II division 1 malocclusion. Iranian Journal of Orthodontics. 2008; 3: 52-58
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a differently designed functional appliance (R-appliance) with a bionator treated group in Class II Division I (Cl II Div I) cases.
Method and Materials: 22 patients (12 girls, 10 boys) treated with R–Appliance were selected as experimental group. Control group consisted of 22 patients (11 boys, 11 girls) treated with a bionator. All of the patients had a Cl II Div I malocclusion due to mandibular deficiency. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at the beginning (T1, T 1) and the end of the study (T 2, T 2).
Results: Paired T-test showed that SNB significantly increased in both groups. The same test revealed that IMPA was reduced in the R-appliance treated group by 4.5°±3.5° (P<0.001) but it was increased by 1.9°±3.9° (P<0.03) in the bionator group. Analysis utilizing T-test showed that the inter group difference of IMPA was statistically significant (P<0.01). SNA showed an increase of 0.1°±1.6° (P<0.9) in the R-appliance treated group; while, it was decreased for 0.4°±0.9° (P<0.1) in the bionator treated group.
Both groups were successful in advancement of mandible; however, the R-appliance achieved this result without retroclination of the lower incisors.
R-appliance, Bionator, Functional therapy, Mandibu
The effects of dental beauty on mental health is an interesting subject which has been…
Pediatric dentistry has always been an important source of concern for parents. Commonly due as…
One of the most common reasons for why children are afraid of dentistry is that…
A crossbite is a type of malocclusion, or a misalignment of teeth, in which upper…
Angular cheilitis or angular stomatitis is a skin inflammatory disorder affecting corners of our mouth.…
Teeth, gums and jaw’s form are the most important constituents of a smile design. For…